Author Archive

A-List blogger in a couple of months?

Saturday, October 27th, 2007

Jason Calacanis writes "I’ve never bought into it since anyone can be on the A-list if they blog intelligently for a couple of months/years."  I’m not sure what exactly his definition of A-list blogger is, but is that really true anymore?  It seems like the volume of blogs, and especially the number of "pro" blog networks out there, has changed the landscape significantly. 

Now, I suppose it might still be true to a degree, especially if someone focuses on writing and linking a lot on a small set of topics covered by an established set of bloggers.  But that’s just more of the same, which is already imo a pretty big failing of a lot of the "A-list" bloggers, many of whom just regurgitate the same stuff a bunch of other "A-list" bloggers are talking about. 

In terms of original content on a wide range of topics, I think it’s really much harder than Jason claims to rise above the noise.  There’s definitely a lot of good stuff being written out there, but I feel like it’s getting harder, not easier, to find.

Looking solely at the tech blogging world and techmeme in specific, what new blogs have emerged as
significant voices in the blogging world over the last few months?  While I’m sure there’s some confirmation bias here, the only one that really pops to mind is Marc Andreesen.  And he’s a very special case for obvious reasons. 

With the growth in volume of blogging, are there really so few new bloggers writing quality content that a bunch of established "A-list" bloggers writing slightly different takes on the newest iPhone or Apple OS happenings is the best stuff out there?   I doubt it.  But the way the blog ecosystem works, there’s a self-reinforcing effect that highly incents bloggers to write on the same topics that already established bloggers are writing about and link to each other.  That trend keeps discussion in the blogging world a lot less interesting and diverse than it could be.

OK, I quit: 3D Mailbox

Thursday, October 25th, 2007

3D Mailbox (via TechCrunch) might just be the most ridiculous thing I have ever seen.  The fact that this app exists makes me reconsider even being in the email field.  This 3D email app (yeah, wtf I know) "brings the thrill of flight to your inbox" and is where "email meets flight sim." Well, OK then.

See, you get an email from Australia, IT ARRIVES ON QANTAS, THAT’S RIGHT! 

Level2ss012a_2

Attachments?  Yeah, FEDEX HAS THOSE!!!!

Level2ss040a

Visit them to check out the rest of their screenshots and watch their sweet trailers.

Funding evolution or anomaly? $13.2M from 150+ angels

Wednesday, October 24th, 2007

There has been a lot of talk recently about the future of the VC market given the abundance of capital in the market and the relatively lower amounts of capital now required to get many companies off the ground.  Firms like Y Combinator, Hit Forge, and First Round Capital are a few of many new firms investing in tech these days.  Some of these firms look more like incubators (remember 12 Entrepeneuring and campsix?) while others look more like traditional seed VCs, many of whom kept increasing funds under management to levels where smaller seed investments no longer made sense.  Plenty of new small funds that straddle the angel/institutional VC fence are starting all the time as individuals cash out from Google and other firms and look for something different. 

With so many different takes on the best funding vehicles for the new generation of tech startups, I found the funding announcement about LinkStorm to be pretty interesting.  "Linkstorm raises $4.2 million from 60 angel investors — The total is up to $13.2 million; the company had already taken $9 million from 150 individuals" writes VentureBeat.  Traditionally it has been pretty rare to see large funding rounds from big groups of angels.  The reasons given are typically time needed to pitch a large number of people, logistics/management of communications with a large group of individuals, and hitting reporting requirements once the number of shareholders exceeds SEC thresholds.  Perhaps things change somewhat, though, when there are a vastly greater number of entrepreneurial-minded people out there who are comfortable with taking $100k shots in early stage startups.  I’m curious to see whether this is just an anomaly or if we’ll see other companies going the route of large angel rounds rather than institutional VC.

The Context Web

Saturday, October 20th, 2007

Brad Feld and John Markoff write about the battle of semantics over what to call the next wave of web/tech applications.

Web 3.0?
The Semantic Web?
The Implicit Web?

I prefer the Context Web.  Or the Contextual Web, though that doesn’t have quite as nice a ring to it.

Let’s look at definitions here (m-w.com):

semantic – "of or relating to meaning in language"
implicit – "capable of being understood from something else though unexpressed : implied"
3.0 – "
The word you’ve entered isn’t in the dictionary."

context – 1
    : the parts of a discourse that surround a word or passage and can throw light on its meaning
   

    2
    : the interrelated conditions in which something exists or occurs : environmentsetting

Context in many ways combines the notions implied by "semantic" and "implicit" to determine the meaning of something by looking at the environment in which it exists.

And that to me is the most exciting and important part of the next wave of solutions we’re starting to see.

When I search for Brad Pitt on the internet, I’m interested in movie reviews and showtimes of upcoming films.  When I search for Brad Feld, I’m interested in descriptions of companies he’s talking about or funding.

When an email comes in, I’m interested in dealing with it in different ways if it’s someone I go to happy hours with on Fridays vs if it’s a customer we’re working on a big deal with. 

When I search for reviews of sushi places in San Francisco, I’m interested in maps and OpenTable listings.  When I search for reviews of El Bulli, I’m interested in plane and hotel information!

These are all the types of contextual distinctions technology is able to draw from us by taking into account who we are and the context in which we look for different types of information.  And I think the context web is a very good way to describe that.

Email is sexy again!

Thursday, October 18th, 2007

So says the Wall Street Journal.   Lots of interesting info about how major providers are now looking at email:

"One experimental Yahoo service known internally as "Friend Finder"
analyzes a user’s email traffic and indicates the friends with whom a
user has strong email connections. It bases its findings on the volume
of incoming and outgoing traffic and such factors as the frequency and
speed with which the two parties respond to each other. The service
works with emails sent by non-Yahoo users as well."

That’s something we’re very familiar with at ClearContext.  We’ve spent the last few years optimizing our algorithms to determine which contacts are really important to you.  We described much of our design philosophy and decisions in this whitepaper 3 years ago.  Contact relationships mined from your email history are at the core of our IMS product for Outlook, which helps prioritize and organize not just email messages, but also tasks and appointments.   But contact priority is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to information that can be learned from looking at the context and relationship of information stored within email.  We’re currently beta testing the next version of IMS and are really excited about releasing it soon for everyone to see, as it will provide a glimpse into some of the really exciting possibilities from within email that have yet to be exposed.

Sick

Monday, September 4th, 2006

Ugh.  What a holiday weekend.  Had aspirations of getting ahead on a lot of work stuff, doing tons of errands,  writing a few blog posts, and doing tons of fun stuff.  Instead, I spent Friday and Saturday in bed w/ the flu/cold/something and just rested watching TV on Sunday.  At least today I was better again and was able to have a great BBQ w/ a bunch of good friends – that really saved the weekend for me.

So, here’s a startup tip for you.  If you want to challenge your immune system, make sure one of your co-founders has a couple of little kids.  That will get a constant stream of new bugs coming into the office until one manages to take you down!  At least by the end of the year I think we’ll have antibodies for everything, though!

I’ll be back in the office tomorrow and look forward to following up on some of my prior entries.  Hope you had a great holiday weekend!

The beta excuse (part 1)

Thursday, August 24th, 2006

I’ve been meaning to start writing more about startup-related stuff – how we get product out, sales and marketing idea/issues/challenges, funding stuff, etc. – in addition to the email-related articles.  Oh, and also toss in some fun stuff about living in the Bay Area like how to eat at Gary Danko last minute or where to get an excellent lunch for under $3.  I’ll get back to the food stuff soon, but right now I’d like to kick off the startup posting with some thoughts on "Beta" as we are beginning our ClearContext IMS 3.0 Beta program.

Back in my enterprise software days, beta was pretty clear.  We’d develop stuff internally, test it, then get everything ready to release and before officially announcing the release, we’d have a small group of customers deploy the software.  In this process, we’d generally find a few bugs and maybe clean up some APIs, expose a couple more things, etc.

At ClearContext we follow a pretty similar path.  Once a new version is more-or-less working, we start using it internally.  At a certain point, we lock down the feature set, stop doing development on new features and start doing formalized testing and bug-fixing on the feature-freeze version of the software.  Once we’ve tested on a number of platforms and fixed all the major bugs we can find,
we move to an "alpha" which we give to a small group of people.  At this point, there are a number of minor bugs left in the software, the occassional major bug, and a lot of usability and fit/finish things to tune.  We use this period to figure out what fine tuning needs to be done to the product to move to a released "GA" (general availability) production release.  After making these changes, we release a "beta" version of the software.  This is more or less the final release, but by putting it in the hands of a wide range of users with all sorts of different environments who use the product in all sorts of different ways, we generally find a few more bugs here as well as some UI/usability suggestions.  We address those issues, then put out a final "release candidate" as a final check prior to marking it our "production release."

This type of progression was for many years more or less standard in the software industry.  People generally had a good idea of what level of stability/polish/etc. to expect from "alpha" "beta" and other such pre-release products.  However, with the advent of web-based software and services, everything has changed.  Beta now can mean anything from "we’re tossing out some crap we threw together yesterday, not sure if it works" to "this service has been running for a very large user base and is really production software, but we haven’t decided on our pricing/revenue model yet or our final feature set, so we’re just calling it beta until we figure all that stuff out."

And this is where things start to become a potential problem as I see a lot of this trend spilling over into non-web based software products as well.  Because now all of a sudden, "beta" can become an excuse to put out shoddy, bug-ridden product that is really more an ad-hoc market test than anything else.  For companies like ours that still deal in real product that we sell to people on a traditional software basis (as opposed to an ad click revenue model or something), this is an important step in the product development process, and the blurring of "beta" lines definitely makes things more confusing to a lot of users out there.

In my next entry, I’ll talk in more detail about how we run our beta process at ClearContext and some of the things I see in "beta excuse" programs out there that I think do nothing but confuse and irritate users.

In the meantime, here are a couple of interesting reads on the topic:

a blog entry from 2004

a WSJ article from 2005

My personal email and task management strategy

Monday, August 14th, 2006

Or, more simply, how I manage my day.

There’s a lot of information out there about email and task management strategies, but many (if not most) of this info is pretty general and focused on high-level strategies and techniques.  I’m going to get much more specific and simply describe how on a daily basis I manage all of my incoming email and associated tasks that get generated.  On a typical day I receive between 100-200 emails.   I usually have 30-50 emails in my inbox when I start the day.  Probably 50 or so of my emails throughout the day are important and require some sort of response/action.  I use a set of techniques that draw from GTD, Total Workday Control, functionality provided by ClearContext IMS, techniques from tons of blogger posts, and tips I’ve come up with over the years to keep my day under control.  With that said, on to the routine:

1. Check the calendar.  This sort of structures the day in my head.  I use a calendar view from Michael Linenberger’s TWC that also displays my current and overdue tasks.  So, at a glance, I have a quick idea of what my day is going to be like.  Sounds silly and simple, but I find this to be a helpful thing to do first thing.

2. I have a handful of newsletters that I review every day (VentureWire, Ferris Research news, a few other daily/weekly ones).  ClearContext AutoAssign rules tags them with a topic name.  I take a quick glance at them and then hit either File (and ClearContext automatically files them to the appropriate folder) or Delete.  I generally spend less than 5 minutes total on this step.

3. I then have a variety of sales reports, sales activity, and support threads that I’m copied on.  All of these are automatically tagged with topics as well.   These are generally just for review and don’t require any action by me.  I take a quick scan of these and see if there’s anything I want to actually jump into, then hit File Topic to file all of them into the appropriate folders.  This takes about 5-15 minutes depending on the nature of the emails that day.

4. Next I review all the stuff at the bottom of new email that ClearContext has colored black or grey.  Most spam is already filtered out, this stuff generally consists of a couple of spam messages that snuck in plus random crap from companies like Dell, United, AA, etc.  It takes all of about 1 minute to take a quick scan of all this stuff and hit delete.

5. I next look at the remaining emails and spend 10-15 minutes responding to everything I know I will be able to provide a quick response to.  90+% of the time I know from the sender/subject which emails will be like this and which ones will require more time.

6. Now I move into what I really like about the GTD system.  I hit the ClearContext Task button and create tasks for all emails that require some real action besides a simple response.  Also I can hit the ClearContext Schedule button to create appointments.  The benefit of ClearContext IMS here is that these tasks/appointments are automatically linked to the email threads, so when I get around to doing these things, I can look at the ClearContext RelatedView to see all related messages and tasks/appointments.  The GTD technique of creating tasks and moving these emails out of the inbox definitely helps me stay more organized and have an accurate idea of what my workload is really like.

7. I typically next have one or two lengthy responses that I need to get to.  By going through the prior steps, I manage to very quickly get through a lot of small tasks rather than get caught up in any longer tasks at the start of my day, which can lead to a lot of things getting backed up.

8. After going through these steps, I’m generally left with only a couple of new unhandled emails in my inbox that I’ll need to do something with later in the day.

9. Throughout the day, on about an hourly basis (ok, every 20-30 minutes), I check my email.  I have Outlook set up so I need to hit send/receive to get new email.  By doing that, when I’m involved in a very focused task, I get to concentrate on that without my email indicator popping up and tempting me to get distracted.  When I do check email, I only pay attention to the email that ClearContext has prioritized as "Normal" or higher and ignore all lower priority email until later.  This week’s TicketWeb and Independent concert lists can probably wait until later.

10. Every few hours I’ll take a quick scan of all my email including the lower priority stuff and file/delete/process as appropriate.

11. At the end of the day, I review all pending tasks and either complete them or reprioritize them. I try to stay pretty on top of this and try to be realistic about when I’m really going to have time to address something.

12. The next end of day task I do is look at how many messages are in my inbox.  If my inbox has grown from the day before, I make myself handle a few more emails before calling it a day.  RIght now this means that my Inbox stays between 20-25 emails.  Hopefully I’ll get that to zero soon.

13. Finally, once (ok, three times) in the evening/night I check my email and respond to some late emails, sort of a head start on the next day’s processing.

I’ve been using this specific process for a number of months now, and for one of the first times in a long time I feel like I’m really on top of what I need to get done, am very responsive to others, and don’t feel constantly behind or overwhelmed.  Hopefully some of these techniques will be helpful for your specific day-to-day email and task management needs, and perhaps some of you will share some of your own personal strategies.

What your inbox says about you

Friday, August 11th, 2006

Interesting WSJ article on how your email management techniques say a lot about you.  A few interesting quotes:

"We’re
discovering that the disorder in our inboxes mirrors the disorder in
our homes, marriages and checkbooks."

"When you’re quick to respond with
offers of help, ‘people use email to turn their crisis into your
emergency,’ she says."

"If you have 1,000 emails
in your inbox, it may mean you don’t want to miss an opportunity, but
there are things you can’t pull the trigger on," Dr. Greenfield says.
"If you have only 10 emails in your inbox, you may be pulling the
trigger too fast and missing the richness of life."

The article is definitely worth reading and a lot of it rings true.  For those of you who fit somewhere in the middle of the two extremes, I hope you’ll give my 10-a-day suggestion a try.

Inbox Survival Tip #1 : Ten a day

Monday, August 7th, 2006

Alright, I guess this implies more tips to come, so hopefully I can figure some out.  And sometime in the near future I’m going to write a lengthy description of my personal email management techniques.

But, in the meantime, here’s a simple tip I used to help get my email life under control.  I just looked at my inbox a while back (at the time it had about 400 emails in it that required some type of action – a response, a task, filing, followup, whatever) and gave myself a simple goal: I would end every day with ten less emails in my inbox than the day before.

I actually beat that goal by a bit, and after a month my Inbox was down to about 20 and lately has been floating between 20 and 30.  I do have intentions of getting it down to empty, but the difference in stress reduction and time savings already is amazing to me.  I’m not sure how much is real improvement and how much is psychological, but my workday is just so much smoother with an inbox like this.

Now, some of you have 10,000 emails sitting in your inbox and will have to wait until I write a much broader scope email management post.  But for those of you who have 100-1000 emails in your inbox, I hope you give this simple task a try.  It’s very easy to stick to and the benefits are amazing.